Talk:Radio Nasha

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Radio Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

This page should not be speedy deleted because...

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (I am working on it's script.) --JapaneseBully (talk) 12:56, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This page should not be speedily deleted because... it is not favouring any particular person, company/corporation, nor showing biased language of any kind. However, lest there is somewhere less content on the significance of the subject, you may delete the page then and there, without a warning. I, as myself, have seen and read through billions of bytes in Wikipedia words. I may categorize this page as a stub but if need be, you can remove it after a moderation. JapaneseBully (talk) 13:39, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I feel like in general, this article is not notable enough to warrant its own dedicated page due to a lack of reliable sources available. If you've found any secondary sources that are not promotional material I would love to see them. Let me know what you think. Thank you. Janos Grotius (talk) 05:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thank you for this new article, but it has no sources that are necessary for verifiability. For pointers, follow the links in the notice at the top of the article. If the article's issues are not addressed, future editors could call for its deletion..

---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 20:44, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]