Talk:Radcliffe-on-Trent

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Nottinghamshire Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nottinghamshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Nottingham and Nottinghamshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NottinghamshireWikipedia:WikiProject NottinghamshireTemplate:WikiProject NottinghamshireNottinghamshire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Radcliffe-on-Trent. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:44, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 December 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: No consensus. (non-admin closure) Colin M (talk) 15:21, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Radcliffe-on-Trent → Radcliffe on Trent – Per Ordnance Survey, name of village and parish. Also per parish council and village sign. Crouch, Swale (talk) 22:57, 14 December 2021 (UTC) — Relisting. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:22, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Crouch, Swale (talk) 10:49, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

- Oppose - certainly not "uncontroversial" as claimed. The parish website referred to uses both spelling in different places. Needs proper discussion. --188.30.224.76 (talk) 10:23, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - Note for example that Royal Mail uses hyphens in the official address: [1]. --188.30.224.76 (talk) 10:41, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - ...and that Nottinghamshire County Council uses hyphens in the name and address of the library: [2] --188.30.224.76 (talk) 10:45, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Unhyphenated version also used on the village's own nameboards. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:03, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. No evidence provided that the common name in English is without the hyphens. Andrewa (talk) 09:20, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.