Talk:Rachel Nichols (actress)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:52, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this article. It may take me some time because I will be traveling on family business starting in the middle of the week.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:52, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Are there any stories describing her academic years. Was she in athletics on campus or any student organizations?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:42, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Do we have any years for the following: "She worked on advertising campaigns for Abercrombie & Fitch, Guess?, and L'Oreal;[4] she also hosted several MTV specials.[5]"?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:42, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Also please elaborate on the specials.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:42, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- None of the above are required. I was hoping for more information.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:35, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have many other comments on the acting career. I just await your responses.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:59, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The main article writer hasn't edited in two months. I'd suggest a fail, though if the concerns are only minor, then you can ask someone in the actors wikiproject to take a look. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 03:18, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have left a 72 hour notice.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:50, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I saw the note and have linked DEA. I also fussed with the filmography. I've never heard of this woman, however. Any remaining issues? Cheers, Jack Merridew 05:15, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This is the best we can hope for in this circumstance. I will pass the article now.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:35, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I added {{personality rights}} to the main image.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:21, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail: