Jump to content

Talk:Rachel McFarlane

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lover

[edit]

Paul van Dyk used the background of Lover for his track? Not the other way round? That she used the music and sung vocals for her track Lover? Really? This would mean, Paul van Dyk basically "stole" her beat? --J-PG ¬_¬ 13:30, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not qualified to say whether the Paul van Dyk song uses ideas from this song; the For an Angel page puts it the other way around - that the McFarlane song uses van Dyk. But regardless of that, this page should reference that mashup as it's one of the most famous of recent ties. Fig (talk) 20:25, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Rachel McFarlane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:04, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]