Talk:Rachel Entwistle

This article was nominated for deletion on 7 February 2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article was nominated for deletion on 2006 June 7. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article was nominated for deletion on 28 June 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

Year of birth

Rachel was born in 1978, not 1979. I was a friend of hers, she was 2 months older than me and I was born in Feb 1979. Someone keeps changing this page to the incorrect year. carolynee (talk) 10:06, 30 January 2008 (PST)

Delete?

I don't think the Rachel and Lillian articles should be deleted. The whole deal with Neil Entwistle has been a very serious and very notable event. ABC, People magazine, CNN, BBC and other media have been covering this case. I don't know if anyone here has followed up on the murders of Rachel and Lillian, but I have and they should stay. — Fanficgurl 1:21, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

Agreed this will be a big case now that Neil Entwistle has been arrested is likely to face trial User:slamdac 14.49, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Merge?

There seems to be no reason why Lillian is afforded a distinct article. I do not believe she meets the notability criteria. Happy to hear reasoned argument to the contrary Dick G 15:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Date of birth

News sources unanimously give Rachel's age as 27 at the date of her death. This does not correlate with the given date of birth within the article. Query whether this astrology chart relates to her [1] (same name, Worcester birth place, same day and month etc), which would suggest the date of birth is one year out and that she was born in 1978, not 1979. Dick G (talk) 05:05, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]