Talk:Rabbit Hood

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Animation: American / Looney Tunes Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Looney Tunes work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Knighting sequence dialogue

Is it "Quarter of Ten" (like the time) or "Water of Ten" (I.e., "water often")? --Jay (Histrion) (talk • contribs) 00:21, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quarter of ten seems much more likely, wouldn't you think? 24.218.79.189 (talk) 03:32, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clean your ears out, it's Quarter of Ten. What comedy writer in 1949 would think calling someone "Water of Ten" would have them rolling in the aisles with laughter?John Simpson54 (talk) 18:45, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's definitely "Quarter of Ten". For the benefit of anyone under the age of 40, "quarter of" is a now-slightly old fashioned way to express a time of day, meaning "approximately 15 minutes before the hour." A natural sort of idiom in an era when everyone use analog mechanical watches that couldn't be expected to be accurate down to the minute anyway. Back then you rarely even bothered to read time down to the minute. 24.5.159.207 (talk) 00:51, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]