Talk:Rabbi Nehemiah

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Judaism

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Veracity

This sounds... wrong. --Eliyak T·C 21:27, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs a lot of work. I corrected the basic biographical fact about him, that he was not a priest mentioned in the Bible, but rather that he was a rabbi circa AD 150. — Loadmaster 16:04, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pi

The article implies that his hypothesis about the biblical nature of Pi has some inherent truth, i.e., "he explained away the common belief that the Bible defines the geometric ratio π (pi) as being exactly equal to 3". However, no proof is cited other than the fact that the modern "hand" has been generalized to 101.6 millimetres. Kings has enough ambiguity in it to cast doubt on his theory. The article needs to make this ambiguity more clear. I question the neutrality of this article. --Sambiun (talk) 23:05, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For one thing, it doesn't matter how long a "handbreath" or even a "cubit" is, because the Biblical description of the "molten sea" (metal bowl) mentions its diameter (10 cu) and circumference (30 cu) in cubits. Another thing is that since the good Rabbi bothered going to the trouble of explaining how the extra handbreath was needed to make the ratio come out right implies that there must have been some discussion of the Biblical account in his day. — Loadmaster (talk) 02:09, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]