Talk:R v Waterfield
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
It's utterly absurd that an article on a landmark case has stated the wrong verdict for three years.
From the judgment: "Held: the convictions must be quashed because in attempting to detain the car, B. and the second constable were not acting in the due execution of their duty at common law" Wnjr (talk) 15:45, 15 February 2009 (UTC)