Talk:R v Hughes (Canada)

Title

According to the University of Calgary Law Faculty link, the proper title of this case is "R v Hughes, 2012 ABPC 250". To conform with Wikipedia custom, the title of this article should therefore be "R. v Hughes". I will move the article, leaving the previous title "Canadian Right to Food Trial" as a redirect. PKT(alk) 20:59, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Message

I received the following today via Wikipedia's email service. I am pasting a copy here in case an interested editor can use something from it. I might have a go myself, depending on time opportunities:

Hi PKT,

You made a comment on this page:

R v Hughes (Canada) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Hughes_(Canada)

I don't know how to edit, but I can supply info that will help improve the veracity & legitimacy of the entry.

1. Is keeping hens in the city a charter right? Other cities permit urban coops but Calgary, Toronto and Winnipeg are holding out

By Anthony A. Davis March 12, 2012

https://www.macleans.ca/news/canada/running-a-fowl-of-the-constitution/

2. The Decision from the Alberta Provincial Court, 2012 ABPC 250 https://www.scribd.com/doc/105846002/R-vs-Paul-Hughes-Canadian-Right-to-Food-Trial-Decision-2012-Calgary

3. Judge rules against Calgary backyard chicken coop September 7, 2012 By The Canadian Press https://www.canadianpoultrymag.com/judge-rules-against-calgary-backyard-chicken-coop-12008/

4. Calgary chicken activist loses bylaw challenge https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/calgary-chicken-activist-loses-bylaw-challenge-1.1277278

I am the individual that appeared in court. I testify that it was me.

My email is paul@xxxxx.ca. My cell is 403.xxx.xxxx.

Do you want me to do anything else? There are other news articles but it seems many are being deleted as they get older.

....PKT(alk) 23:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)