Talk:RIM-67 Standard

Military history: Maritime / Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Title

Please note that a discussion is ongoing at Talk:RIM-161 Standard missile 3, as to whether the "M" in missile should be capitalised. Seeing as this could affect this article, I feel that it should be mentioned here. --GW_Simulations_{User Page | Talk} 22:30, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Foreign (non-USA) Use

Should add to list the Foreign users/ships. I believe it is a short list- only 2 Italian ships. 74.214.40.18 (talk) 19:47, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll research non-USN ships with Terrier systems that were modified to fire the RIM-67A Standard. Two way time (talk) 03:43, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RIM-156A (ex-RIM-67E) SM-2ER Block IV

I say that missile should have its own separate page. That missile with its booster I believe is only 18 feet long (max possible in Mk 41 VLS launcher). As you see original RIM-67 and Mk 10 GMLS handled a longer missile. RIM-156A (ex-RIM-67E) SM-2ER Block IV booster is Totally different. I do not know original idea of this missile- was it envy by the Aegis and VLS community over the SM/ER missile range and an effort to try and match it. Or was the origin of this from the BMD efforts. Wfoj3 (talk) 23:30, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on RIM-67 Standard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:48, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Operational History

Currently has 3 paragraphs, entries- Only the first applies here, the other 2 should be moved to RIM-66 - for which those cases apply. Wfoj3 (talk) 11:38, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]