Talk:RBD discography

Latin music Low‑importance

	Latin music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Discographies

This article is within the scope of the Discographies WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's collection of discography articles and lists. If you would like to participate please visit the project page. Any questions pertaining to discography-related articles should be directed to the project's talk page.DiscographiesWikipedia:WikiProject DiscographiesTemplate:WikiProject DiscographiesDiscography articles

Mexico Low‑importance

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:Envivo2.jpg

Image:Envivo2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:25, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request for discography-lock

For the IP adresses that are contantly faking sales, changing colors, removing quotation marks from songs and more. Just to clear some things up:

According to this article and here again, names of arts (songs in this case) from a foreign country (Mexico in this case) should be in lower case, if the word(s) is/are untranslated. As these songs are all in Spanish, a language written in Latin alphabet, they are untranslated and so should be in lower case.
According to this article, songs/singles should be in quotes. Could you STOP removing them? This is the way it is supposed to be here on wikipedia. If you don't like it, then leave!
According to this article, chart tables should be formatted using class="wikitable". That is not the case here. Also, the same article does not mention anything about colors, meaning they do not have to be there. For this, they should be removed. Still, they keep on getting edited back.
There is no need for an article for the following statement that sales should not be blown up unless you use a decent reference for it. Most people here just count up a few 100,000 an album, expect it "must have past that sales number by now". Well that is not the case until there is a official/confirming reference for that!

I hope in the future, we will all follow these rules. -- Luigi-ish 21:16, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:RBD-Celestial (Versao Brasil)-Frontal.jpg

Image:RBD-Celestial (Versao Brasil)-Frontal.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:30, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Quehay.jpg

Image:Quehay.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:41, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

semi-protect

For the time being I have placed a semi-protect on this page due to the reverts by IP several addresses which remove cleanup to bring the article to adhere to WP:MoS, this includes the removal of quotation marks from song titles, excessive, unnecessary coloring of tables, spacing within piped wikilinks (which offset/add an extra space when displayed) and the boldfacing of album titles. IP edits have been reverted by myself and others. Thanks. - eo 21:48, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In singles, in Spain Ser o Parecer was is 7th position. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.60.96.160 (talk) 02:24, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Empezar Desde Cero is Platium in Mexico, and RBD sold with ED0 300.000 worldwide. And Inalcanzable, in Mexico, is nº3 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.144.33.238 (talk) 23:03, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RBD was sold in Spain 80.000 CDs. Empezar Desde Cero is gold in Spain. And is Platium in Mexico —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.17.253.214 (talk) 23:31, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Now Inalcanzable is 2 in mexico, 10 in chile and 6 in colombia. please, change the position in this page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.44.68.27 (talk) 22:56, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Empezar Desde Cero is PLATINUM in SPAIN and ORO in U.S.A.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.44.68.27 (talk) 22:56, 2 March 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.68.91.136 (talk) [reply]

There are news positions for the single Empezar Desde Cero. Is nº22 in latin pop airplay, in United States, is nº1 in mexico, in Latin America is at 5th at the moment.

In Romania, Inalcanzable is now in 82th position, and Besame Sin Miedo was at nº2. please change the positions. And put the new positions for Empezar Desde Cero, please.

RBD's true sales:
Rebelde: 3.0 million
Nuestro Amor: 2.6 million
Celestial: 1.8 million
Rebels: 1.2 million
Empezar Desde Cero: 1.0 million (at the moment)

Tour Generación En Vivo: 0.7 million (700 mil)
Live In Hollywood: 0.6 million (600 mil)
Tour Celestial 2007 - Hecho En España: 0.3 million (300 mil)

In total: 11.2 million
PLEASE, CHANGE THE NUMBERS!

In OTHER SONGS the song from Empezar Desde Cero NO DIGAS NADA is number 10th from the list of bolivian singles chart —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.17.248.149 (talk) 13:51, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And there are positions in the singles that are not correct. Rebelde, Aun Hay Algo and Nuestro Amor were in Mexico nº1. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.60.90.126 (talk) 00:48, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please, change the Empezar Desde Cero's certification in Mexico. Amprofon has confirmed that CD has been certified 4xPlatinum in Mexico. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.60.94.0 (talk) 20:36, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen this claim twice today, but when I go to Amprofon's certifications, it only shows single platinum. Can you provide a link to a quadruple-platinum certification?—Kww(talk) 20:52, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Semiprotection review

21:41, 3 August 2007 Ericorbit protected RBD discography ‎ (recent IP reverting to cleanup to article per MoS (several IPs, 201.27.x.x) [edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirmed])

This was some time ago and it doesn't seem to have been intended to last that long. Perhaps it's time to remove the semiprotection and keep a vigilant eye on the article to make sure the vandals don't come back. As well as welcoming comments from regular editors I've contacted the protecting sysop, Ericorbit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA).

--TS 04:45, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]