Talk:RAF Coastal Command during World War II/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Harrison49 (talk) 18:15, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- References are well used and numerous.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Covers the subject comprehensively.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- The article maintains a neutral point of view.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- The article is not subject to any edit warring.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- All images are covered by public domain or fair use licences. Could File:Vickers Warwick B ASR Mk1 - BV285.jpg now be tagged as in the public domain?
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall: Excellent article. This covers the topic really well. Harrison49 (talk) 21:49, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail: