Talk:Rørvik Airport/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 23:21, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Rørvik Airport, Ryum's Norway Airlines, I TBr and ley am your pilot today, we will be taking out in a few minutes to the Penticton Regional Airport. Enjoy the flight!

"five other regional airport" should be plural, missing an "s" at the end
- Fixed. Arsenikk ^(talk) 18:13, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"along with for three" remove "for", unnecessary
- Fixed. Arsenikk ^(talk) 18:13, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"announced on on" two "on"? Remove one
- Would you prefer the first or the last removed? ;) Arsenikk ^(talk) 18:13, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"bus service to the airport" for more clearer prose I would add "available" between "service" and "to"
- Fixed. Arsenikk ^(talk) 18:13, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What's the point of table being sortable if there is only one item?
- Ask the people who made the template. It's a standardized table designed by WikiProject Airports, although it is by far the most elegant on Wikipedia. Arsenikk ^(talk) 18:13, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Can you ensure that the table meets WP:ACCESS for scope cols and rows
- This uses a standardized template which is transcluded on every single airport article, so I'm not going to mess with it. WP:ACCESS and DTT are not part of the GA criteria so I would rather not pursue it any further. Arsenikk ^(talk) 18:13, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Can you also ensure that it meets WP:DTT for table captions?
- See above. Arsenikk ^(talk) 18:13, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Any external links?
- Official site is in the navbox. Arsenikk ^(talk) 18:13, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Any related portals to this subject?
- Added. Arsenikk ^(talk) 18:13, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great work overall. Once the above issues are addressed, I will pass the article based on the good article criteria. Well done! TBr and ley 02:58, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review and sorry for the slight delay. As I noted above, I used a standardized template for the table that doesn't meet any guideline but is within the scope of the GA criteria. Arsenikk ^(talk) 18:13, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your very welcome. I will pass the article based on your changes now. TBr and ley 23:15, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.