Talk:Rørvik Airport

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rørvik Airport article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Rørvik Airport has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 23, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

Norway

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Airports

	Aviation portal This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
	This article is supported by the airport project.

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Rørvik Airport, Ryum/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 23:21, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Rørvik Airport, Ryum's Norway Airlines, I TBr and ley am your pilot today, we will be taking out in a few minutes to the Penticton Regional Airport. Enjoy the flight!

"five other regional airport" should be plural, missing an "s" at the end
- Fixed. Arsenikk ^(talk) 18:13, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"along with for three" remove "for", unnecessary
- Fixed. Arsenikk ^(talk) 18:13, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"announced on on" two "on"? Remove one
- Would you prefer the first or the last removed? ;) Arsenikk ^(talk) 18:13, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"bus service to the airport" for more clearer prose I would add "available" between "service" and "to"
- Fixed. Arsenikk ^(talk) 18:13, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What's the point of table being sortable if there is only one item?
- Ask the people who made the template. It's a standardized table designed by WikiProject Airports, although it is by far the most elegant on Wikipedia. Arsenikk ^(talk) 18:13, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Can you ensure that the table meets WP:ACCESS for scope cols and rows
- This uses a standardized template which is transcluded on every single airport article, so I'm not going to mess with it. WP:ACCESS and DTT are not part of the GA criteria so I would rather not pursue it any further. Arsenikk ^(talk) 18:13, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Can you also ensure that it meets WP:DTT for table captions?
- See above. Arsenikk ^(talk) 18:13, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Any external links?
- Official site is in the navbox. Arsenikk ^(talk) 18:13, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Any related portals to this subject?
- Added. Arsenikk ^(talk) 18:13, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great work overall. Once the above issues are addressed, I will pass the article based on the good article criteria. Well done! TBr and ley 02:58, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review and sorry for the slight delay. As I noted above, I used a standardized template for the table that doesn't meet any guideline but is within the scope of the GA criteria. Arsenikk ^(talk) 18:13, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your very welcome. I will pass the article based on your changes now. TBr and ley 23:15, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Rørvik Airport, Ryum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.namdalsavisa.no/Nyhet/article5311369.ece
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120807013949/https://www.ippc.no/norway_aip/current/AIP/AD/ENRM/EN_AD_2_ENRM_en.pdf to https://www.ippc.no/norway_aip/current/AIP/AD/ENRM/EN_AD_2_ENRM_en.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120807013949/https://www.ippc.no/norway_aip/current/AIP/AD/ENRM/EN_AD_2_ENRM_en.pdf to https://www.ippc.no/norway_aip/current/AIP/AD/ENRM/EN_AD_2_ENRM_en.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nrk.no/kanal/nrk_sapmi/1.6426054
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120528193421/http://www.avinor.no/en/airport/rorvik/timetables to http://www.avinor.no/en/airport/rorvik/timetables

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:13, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]