Talk:Régua railway station

Régua railway station was nominated as a Engineering and technology good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (March 28, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Portugal High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Portugal To-do:

Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.

Improve key articles to Good article

Improve

Review

Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).

Requests

See Requested articles

Assess

Help assessing articles.

Need images

Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia

Wikify

Vote:

Watch this list — Edit this list

Trains: Stations Mid‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.

This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

Stations

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of train stations and metro stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StationsWikipedia:WikiProject StationsTemplate:WikiProject StationsStations articles

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:19, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

Unsuccessful. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:40, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Régua railway station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: V.B.Speranza (talk · contribs)

Reviewer: Pi.1415926535 (talk · contribs) 19:39, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This article is well researched and clearly has potential to reach Good Article status. However, it is not there yet, and needs more improvement than can reasonably be expected during a GA review. Three of the Good Article criteria are not met:

1a (the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct): The translation quality here is not sufficient for GA. For example, there are untranslated words like Abril, mistranslations like lanes, and awkward wording like Station at its surroundings. There are also issues with excessive bolding, and with unneeded capitalization of words like horsecar and port wine.
1b (it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections...: Two sentences is not a sufficient lede for an article of this length, and it does not accurately summarize the article.
3a (it addresses the main aspects of the topic): There is no information about the station building itself, and no information about what services stop at the station.

Additionally, the last two sections should be removed entirely: the quoted literary reference is not about the station whatsoever, and the gallery is unnecessary per WP:GALLERY.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.