Talk:Quinn Bradlee

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Disability

Quinn Bradlee is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Qbradlee (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Qbradlee82 (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

Family tree notable?

Is the subject's family tree really notable/encyclopedic? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.35.97.2 (talk) 17:21, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what you mean? See Category:Family trees for the many precedents. So yes, I thought so. Especially when so many ancestors are independently notable. In this case there already was a Crowninshield family article. The general rule for a person having their own article is that being related to notable people is not enough to make them notable. But if there are other reasons they deserve an article, then any information given in reliable sources about them can be included. Even if you do not like it. In fact, the old paper encyclopedias of the past often spent much more time on ancestry that current celebrity status. If you want to change wikipedia conventions for biographies, this can be discussed at, say, Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (biographies). W Nowicki (talk) 20:06, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this article qualifies for deletion as subject is not notable, article reads like a puff piece and appears to be largely edited by the subject i.e. Qbradlee and Qbradlee82. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.30.55.17 (talk) 01:49, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest removing autobiography warning

While earlier versions of this article might have been autobiographical, the current references, citations and valid secondary-source links appear to substantiate a neutral POV about the subject of the article. As such, I suggest removing the autobiography warning.2001:558:6008:3B:1D26:437E:145B:7EA3 (talk) 00:26, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

With no stated opposition in the week since the Talk Page statement was made that suggested removing the article's autobiography warning (because it appears no longer applicable to the article), I have removed the warning. 2001:558:6008:3B:1D26:437E:145B:7EA3 (talk) 00:46, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Add new references, citations and links

I have edited the article by adding several new page-layout improvements, and references, citations and links to provide more evidence of the subject's life, work and interests. These additions continue to show that, whatever autobiographical edits might have previously been included, the article is now based substantially on neutral, secondary sources. 2001:558:6008:3B:1D26:437E:145B:7EA3 (talk) 20:16, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Quinn Bradlee. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.ldaamerica.org/stateline/documents/09apr/quinn-bradlee.pdf
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/health/jan-june09/bradlee_05-06.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:17, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]