Talk:Quincy Media

Illinois Low‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Newspapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for merging with Gray Television on 9 September 2021. The result of the discussion (permanent link) was to not merge.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Quincy Newspapers. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.lib.niu.edu/ipo/ihy011206.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:15, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was not to merge Quincy Media into Gray Television. There has been a strong opposition against the proposal. The only user in support of the merge (the proposer) has been blocked. – NJD-DE (talk) 15:09, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I propose to merge Quincy Media into Gray Television. I think that the content in the Quincy Media article can easily be explained in the context of Gray Television and the Gray Television article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Quincy Media will not cause any problems as far as article size is concerned. Peyton dodeon (talk)

Oppose: While the companies themselves merged, that does not usually mean we merge the articles about them. --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:59, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Strongly Opposed I agree with Wcquidditch on this. The Quincy article has so much history as an independent entity before Gray's acquisition. It would be inappropriate to lose this article. Keep it as it is. Csworldwide1 (talk) 16:58, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Will gray Television owns some of Quincy stations Peyton dodeon (talk) 18:07, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Big time Support: While Quincy Media is gone Peyton dodeon (talk) 18:12, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Who will s9rport me Peyton dodeon (talk) 20:40, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Firmly agree QNI had to much history and roll in American media ownership, especally in the midwest, to be merged with the Grey aritcle. Packerfan386 (talk) 19:11, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.