Talk:Quinceañera (film)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Bobamnertiopsis (talk · contribs) 22:43, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good lord, this has been waiting for too long. I'm happy to do a review and honestly, it doesn't look like there's much to be done before this is GA-worthy. BobAmnertiopsis ∴_ChatMe! 22:43, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

1a

These aren't necessary to pass GA but per the MOS, a few commas are needed:

Comma after "on August 2, 2006"
Comma after "working-class neighborhood of Echo Park, Los Angeles"
Comma after "premiered on January 23, 2006"

1b

Superb.

2

Ref layout is pristinely consistent which tickles my stickler's heart.
All sources look reliable and they're used abundantly throughout the article.
Also really well cited throughout. No information is without a citation. Good job with that!

3

It's a fairly short article as film articles go but main topics (Plot, Cast, Production, Release, Reception, Accolades) are all there.
Lots of good tidbits in this article about the low-budget production of this film but no tangents.

4

Neutral and due weight given in the Reception section; praise (and detraction) are not repetitious.

5

Occasional editing but no warring since February. Looks good.

6a

Poster image is non-free but has very thorough FUR and is hosted on en.wiki.
The image of Ross and Garcia is free (CC-BY 2.0) and hosted on commons.

6b

This is my one question before I'll pass this article: is the image of Ross and Garcia at Sundance from their time with Quinceañera or does it come from a separate Sundance experience? In either case, I'd indicate that in the image's caption, and also include an approximate date (Month Year) to give the reader some context. If it's not from Quinceañera, it's probably still relevant enough to include but I'd like to know that it isn't from that film's press tour (or premiere tour or whatever it may be).

No dabs, no copyvio detected.

This is looking really good. 6b is really the only qualm I have and it's not even so much a qualm as a clarification. I look forward to being able to pass this article once that's cleared up! All the best, BobAmnertiopsis ∴_ChatMe! 23:19, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll put this on hold for the time being. Is 7 days alright? BobAmnertiopsis ∴_ChatMe! 23:21, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bob, thanks for the review! I have added in the missing commas and have clarified the caption of the image – I'm not 100% sure that the photo was specifically taken while the actors were promoting the film, but it was definitely taken at the festival where the film premiered, which I've now noted. Hopefully that's clearer now. Thanks again. 97198 (talk) 12:00, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lovely! With that, I'm happy to pass the article! Fantastic work! BobAmnertiopsis ∴_ChatMe! 13:45, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! 97198 (talk) 10:41, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]