Jump to content

Talk:Queensland Council of Unions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

We already have a list of affiliate organisations so we don't need a list of external links to those organisations. The list of affiliates does little to inform the reader about the QCU so its inclusion is marginal at best while the external links are not appropriate. I've already removed them once however User:Robertwhyteus has reverted without discussion. Other opinions? - Shiftchange (talk) 10:47, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Sorry I didn't realise you had deleted the external links. I thought I had mis-saved the file. Email notification of talk adds and changes to watched pages hasn't worked for me for a couple of years, I don't know why. So I rely on seeing the menu bar alert which I sometimes don't notice. Robertwhyteus (talk) 20:37, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • A peak body is nothing if not a coordinating organisations for its affiliates, so I would have the list of affiliates is the basic factual information necessary in a page about them, but maybe I am missing something. You say it is marginal at best? Anyway you have left them, so I guess that's not in question.
  • External links I would have thought are useful in taking people to the source of content for those affiliated organisations, but is your reasoning the web sites, being owned by those organisations, are not editable like Wikipedia therefore not balanced or encyclopaedic, therefore having no place on a wiki page? I understand this could be true and if its policy not to have such links, fair enough. Some don't have wiki pages though so someone wanting to more might find them useful. I suppose they could just ask Lord Google.
  • Whatever you think is a fair thing, and I'll try to keep an eye on the page manually, to see what you decide. Robertwhyteus (talk) 20:37, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Influence or Achievements section

[edit]

I think the article lacks some critical review of its power and influence. Chapter 6, 'The Industrial and Political Role of the Trades and Labour Council of Queensland since 1922: A Reassessment' in Peak Unions in Australia: Origins, Purpose, Power, Agency discusses the union's lack of majority representation and suggests it has been the lest effective state scale union councils in Australia. I've got the some reading to do before I add content and citations from the source as it appears to be useful. - Shiftchange (talk) 22:18, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

sounds good to me. ;-p Robertwhyteus (talk) 00:16, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Queensland Council of Unions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:15, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]