Talk:Queen Victoria (ship)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / British / European SIA‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

SIA

This article has been rated as SIA-class on the project's quality scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Untitled

There are three subjects to this page: RMS Queen Mary, repeating the unproven story that she originally was to have been named after Queen Victoria; Arcadia, which apparently was to have been named after Victoria, but was not; and MS Queen Victoria now under construction. As indicated, each vessel already has its own page. Neither extant ship was ever actually named Victoria and there is no likliehood of confusion. There is no need for this page and it should be deleted. Kablammo 22:58, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree...so here's what I propose, since I'm working in the area of ships on Wikipedia...over the next few days, I'll ensure that the content is properly elsewhere, then turn this into a disambiguation page, with a disambig link also on the article about the actual Queen. Any objections before I proceed? Akradecki 21:09, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There were no comments, so the page has been converted to a disambig page, with two more ships added. Akradecki 17:17, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]