Talk:Queen's Hall

Queen's Hall has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 23, 2011	Peer review	Reviewed
September 18, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

Current status: Good article

Classical music

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

London Mid‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sections

Hi, each section should be at least 3-4 paragraphs, having a separate section for each paragraph is a bit overkill. Division by manager might be a better approach, also the name of the hall should be avoided in section headings, and 'the'. HTH Kbthompson 11:53, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Other uses

Why no mention of the hall's other uses? It was the venue for some important political meetings, though one would never know it to read this article. 81.145.246.223 (talk) 18:27, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Now mentioned. -- Ssilvers (talk) 14:45, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Queen's Hall/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk • contribs • count) 11:43, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Will begin read through in next 6 hours.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:43, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Intro

No infobox? How about one with a pin map showing location? Not essential but would help. At least say in the intro where the theatre was located.
- I hate infoboxes, and avoid them except where they are compulsory. I'll amend the intro as you suggest. Tim riley (talk) 15:45, 17 September 2011 (UTC) Now done. Tim riley (talk) 08:03, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"The hall had drab decor and cramped seating but superb acoustics." This appears subjective.
- These points are covered in more detail (with refs) in the main text. Tim riley (talk) 15:45, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Construction

"In the centre of the arena there was a fountain containing pebbles, goldfish and waterlilies.[10] According to the conductor Sir Thomas Beecham, "Every three or four minutes some fascinating young female fell into the fountain and had to be rescued by a chivalrous swain. It must have happened thirty-five times every night. Foreigners came from all parts of Europe to see it."[11] At the top of the building, adjoining the conservatory, was the Queen's Small Hall, seating 500, for recitals, chamber-music concerts and other small-scale presentations. In July 1894, Bernard Shaw described it as "cigar-shaped with windows in the ceiling, and reminiscent of a ship's saloon … now much the most comfortable of our small concert rooms".[5] The hall provided modern facilities, open frontage for carriages and parking room, a press room, public spaces and bars.[12]"

There is inconsistency with full stops in or outside of quotes throughout the article. Please adopt a consistent format.

Excellent point. I'll proof-read carefully and amend. Tim riley (talk) 15:45, 17 September 2011 (UTC) Now done. (23 changes! whoops!) Tim riley (talk) 08:03, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Second World War

Please wikilink St George's Hotel, dabbed appropriately. If its a red link I'll look into starting it myself.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:10, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. Tim riley (talk) 15:45, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are ahead of me. I salute you. Tim riley (talk) 08:03, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for these comments, all very much to the point. I'll take action as mentioned above later today. Tim riley (talk) 15:45, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Sehr gut! Meets requirements. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:30, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Queen's Hall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120716210428/http://www.westminster.gov.uk/services/leisureandculture/greenplaques/ to http://www.westminster.gov.uk/services/leisureandculture/greenplaques/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:43, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Queen's Hall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110712064944/http://www.earlycinema.com/pioneers/acres_bio.html to http://www.earlycinema.com/pioneers/acres_bio.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:49, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]