Talk:Quarter cubic honeycomb
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Quarter cubic honeycomb article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
what about it?
[edit]Why do the words rectified cubic appear in the box? —Tamfang (talk) 04:10, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
- Strange, must have pulled it in accidentally by copy&paste? Tom Ruen (talk) 05:15, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
siblings
[edit]The table of "A3 honeycombs" is baffling to me. There ought to be a column saying explicitly, with links, that
- one ring = alternated cubic
- two opposite rings = rectified cubic
- three rings = truncated alternated cubic
- four rings = bitruncated cubic
and that each of these has "higher" symmetry than the quarter-cubic. —Tamfang (talk) 18:13, 14 August 2021 (UTC)