Talk:Quark-nova

Astronomy: Astronomical objects Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.

‹See TfM›

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

quark bombs

i think we need to realize that the understanding of quarks and quark stars and quark novas will lead, inevitably, to the development of quark weapons, of unimaginable destructive capability. i dont know if there is a place on wikipedia for such a hypothetical article, but there is a place for plenty of fictional nonsense about elves and goblins. . . hopefully enough SF authors will use it so they can be cited...

"The confinement of quarks inside a small volume, such as inside a neutron or proton, costs energy because the light up and down quarks would prefer to occupy a much greater volume. This makes the mass of a proton, for instance, about 50-200 times heavier than the total mass of the three quarks inside it. (A proton has a mass of 1.67 x 10-27 kg = 0.938 GeV c-2, whereas the mass of two isolated up quarks and a down quark would only be 0.005-0.02 GeV c-2.) Indeed, most of the inertial mass of protons and neutrons, and hence of practically all the matter around us, originates from the confinement of quarks, rather than their inertial masses " physics world article by Emanuele Quercigh

count

Two quark novae per day in the Milky Way is totally absurd; if this were true, then there would be nearly 10 trillion quark stars in our galaxy, which is 100 times the number of normal stars. Referencing the original source shows that it was carelessly worded. The statement is two quark novae per day in the observable universe, not in the Milky Way. I'm changing this in both this entruy, and the Quark star entry.

Merge?

Should this be merged with the Quark Star entry? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.58.197.254 (talk) 15:10, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Quark-nova. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20131213213311/http://quarknova.ucalgary.ca/media/ to http://quarknova.ucalgary.ca/media/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:58, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Quark-nova. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6DyUxqeIj?url=http://quarknova.ucalgary.ca/ to http://quarknova.ucalgary.ca/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:37, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]