Talk:Quantum gravity/Archive for 2019

We don't have permanent quantized phenomena in nature; fields do lose and gain non quantized potential; not only discernable events occur in nature (because many alternative quantized particle pathways exist in nature; if a phenomenon is very gradual and weak, it can be discribed with extremely many alternative pathways; only specifics are mathematically solvable, but because a huge amount of alternative specifics occur at low energy gradual phenomena, the overall averaged phenomenon appears non quantized) Even in high energies the exact same applies, but because the energy is huge, then the average of all alternative energies narrows to a very narrow band of alternative energies

A quantum measurement forces discrete/quantized attributes/characteristics/qualities to appear. Only quantized phenomena can be measured at the particle (near-Plankian) level.

We don't measure gravity by measuring simultaneously all the particles.

Not all values are quatize if not measured.

Measurement isn't the hypernym.

The important hypernymous semantics is "to engage some of the properties of some particles in relation to each other" (biased attributes of some particles, for example the observed particle and the observer particle; observe and being observed are hyponymous senses/term; the most important to engage some properties of some particules to have a relational bias; that's the important semantics.

"Properties of particles engaged in relational bias" is a hypernym of "measured/observed particles" (stupidity leads to religion, some claim that only the children of Jesus can cause quantum entanglement, because they're disentangled from intelligence, and have free time).

Not all particles are engaged in strong relational bias (for religious people: entanglement caused by observation; which is correct but only as a hyponym of the other possible causes of relational bias of properties in a group of particles) (in soft they are necessarily, because they dwell in the same univese).

We don't measure simultaneously everything (I said it in a way simpletons can understand).

Gravity is mostly the result of the non simultaneity of mostly partial (study the mathematics of partial quantum entanglement) which occurs here and there, inside a gravitational group of particles; but it's not a simultaneous quantum entanglement/measurement/relational bias of quantum properties.

Bad people who shouldn't be physicists, claim that all phenomena are permanently measured (by god?), permanently quantized and permanently particles. That is wrong and if it was true we wouldn't have complex entangled states.

Quantum physics is quantum momentarily and for the measurement of specific attributes. The criminals of quantum gravity who want to ruin physics with mythology don't understand that.

"Quantized physics without intermediate states" is a misnomer, the full name of the field of study is "physical theory of the exhibition of quantized phenomena during specifically and not generically mentioned interactions".

It's not every field property permanently quantized during the intermediate states before the collapse of wave functions. The field properties exhibit non quantized ranges of probabilistic future quantized engaged state values.

The probabilistic range of values of a future quantized engaged state is not quantized before the collapse of the wave function. That is extremely important, otherwise physics doesn't work.

Permanent measurement theory = quantum gravity = I believe in god (supposed precosmic personhood, and the erroneous belief that personhood is the utmost fundamental process of more fundamental components like memories... doesn't make sense).

Gravity requires understanding over the non simultaneity of the partial relational engagements which pop in and out (the partial engagements).

Gravity is the gradual decay of the popping (in and out of existence) of the mostly partial (not fully entangled) relational engagements of the properties of particles. Imagine an enormous amount of soft interactions which don't necessarily affect immediately a quantized state (this also happens at some ratio), but the wave function's probabilistic range of future collapses, but the probabilistic range isn't quantized before the collapse. These interactions have a slight bias towards the center of gravity, because being not fully collapsed as specific quantized properties, are wave functions, and the wave functions care about their future which is ideally a proper quantized collapse; these wave functions act as antennae because they are spread out, and they know that they have more ideal future towards the center of gravity, because all the want is a quantized proper collapse and they don't like the fact that they lose energy slowly without proper collapse; because if the lose as fields enough energy, in the future will sometime collapse but at a lower quantum energy level (they will "lose face" in quantum society). Particles prefer the easy path and not the slow path and prefer to immediately collapse - when the conditions are right - at a high energy level and not to gradually lose energy as fields which didn't have the chance to become centralized particles and when they decay in the future will decay at a lower energy level, because they'd lost energy gradually as fields and not as centralized and quantized sepecific events. Particles don't like to gradually lose energy as fields without a proper decay as particles, but the conditions aren't always beneficial because specific energy levels are required in order we have proper engagement of the properties of the particles, other wise these particles lose energy as fields gradually and in a non quantize manner. write it with gold letters: The particles within a gravitational group gradually lose potential in a non quanized manner as they partially engage their properties. The quantum gravitees are simpletons. The nowadays quantum gravity theorists are simpletons. We cannot escape from facts. Even if most people are wrong, few will understand physics, and few simpletons are educated enough to understand the harm they caused to physics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:4111:ED00:AC0C:14C4:8940:2AC1 (talk) 02:58, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

The engaged particles with a detector are 99.99999% of what it happened but the detector has a biased specific biased engagement with the phenomenon; now at very high energy phenomena, we strongly change the physical actuality; but in case of a low energy detection; not only we increase the possibility of non detection, but we even lower the change we cause to that specific particle (so the probabilistic range of all possible actualities is not narrow as in high energy detections) (I don't mention it in a sad way because we can balance that phenomenon out and get relatively good results, but in theoretical physics we should keep that in mind, otherwise we create mythology and not physics

. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:4111:ED00:AC0C:14C4:8940:2AC1 (talk) 03:15, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

make paragraph: Gradual decay of mixed state (physics)

Stochastic gradient descent is one method to calculate the gradual degradation of field potential (if an object falls down it has less gravitational potential; if it's not an object but a field the same is true but mathematically it's more complicated). (Artificial neural network techniques for huge calcifications which might exhibit a secondary benefit due to some semantical kinship of the processes). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:4115:6D00:AC0C:14C4:8940:2AC1 (talk) 04:23, 10 August 2019 (UTC)