Talk:Quantum contextuality

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Aschimmo, Dylanhecht. Peer reviewers: Arinconl, Jleamer1.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 15:22, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide a link

Please provide a link to the paper referred to in the phrase “ this generalizes Arthur Fine's analysis of Bell's theorem”. Is it reference[8]? A link here would save researchers considerable time and effort. Thanks Hephaestus II (talk) 22:14, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Fine–Abramsky–Brandenburger theorem"

Regarding this edit: I had never heard the result called that, but on a lark, I checked, and it is attested [1][2]. Still, "Fine's theorem" is much more common, and I definitely think we should stick with it as the established term. XOR'easter (talk) 18:52, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

High importance physics or math article?

This article is rated as a high importance physics article but the content seems almost all math. That's a missed opportunity from the physics side: contextually expresses the opposite of hidden variables. Johnjbarton (talk) 17:33, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These importance ratings are of little relevance. If you think it's not appropriate feel free to change the it. Tercer (talk) 07:33, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, but if I change it into a physics article with math folks be unhappy. That is what I was trying to say. Johnjbarton (talk) 15:54, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, sorry, I misunderstood you. The categories are not exclusive, though, it can have both a physics and a math rating. Tercer (talk) 21:57, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]