Talk:Quantum cognition

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cognitive science, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cognitive scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Cognitive scienceTemplate:WikiProject Cognitive scienceCognitive science articles

‹See TfM›

Physics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contributors

Contributors to this web site are academics from various fields including psychology, physics, and economics.Jbusemey (talk) 15:11, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The articles cited in this document use the concepts of quantum cognition. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbusemey (talk • contribs) 20:21, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

We need to fix the section on Gestalt Psychology. There is a complaint of too much detail. I suggest that Dr. Elio Conte create a new wikipedia cite that summarizes his personal contributions. Then we can shorten this section to a sentence or two that cites the new wikipedia cite by Dr. Conte.--Jbusemey (talk) 12:32, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I just removed promotional and unreferenced material related to Elio. If this material is notable enough in the field, it could be summarized but it would need to be rewritten and referenced. Thanks, —Paleo Neonate – 00:14, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have clarified the relevance of the reference I recently added, per PaleoNeonate's remarks. —Gmusser (talk) 17:29, 21 January 2018 (UTC)gmusser[reply]

Please Read the Greek text and update the English version (why not all basics described???)

Συνειδησιακή κυματοσυνάρτηση on wikipedia

in English: conscientious wavefunction — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.84.217.139 (talk) 22:53, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quantum cognition and quantum entanglement

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Quantum_entanglement#Quantum_cognition_and_quantum_entanglement Text mdnp (talk) 22:37, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Local hidden-variable theory — Preceding unsigned comment added by Text mdnp (talk • contribs) 22:39, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NeuroQuantology

This article includes several references to NeuroQuantology, which appears to be a pseudoscience journal. Jarble (talk) 16:21, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Updated Sources

This article seems as though it may benefit from updated/current sources. Here is a possible candidate: https://jbusemey.pages.iu.edu/quantum/annurev-psych.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sami.monroe (talk • contribs) 03:54, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to focus on "quantum cognition" based on Pothos and Busemeyer review

The current article muddles ideas from psychology with content that overlaps quantum mind. I propose to move all the neurologically related material into quantum mind and focus the content here on the view given in

Pothos, Emmanuel M.; Busemeyer, Jerome R. (2022-01-04). "Quantum Cognition". Annual Review of Psychology. 73 (1): 749–778. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-033020-123501. ISSN 0066-4308.

They describe how quantum probability theory solves multiple problems with classical probability theory in psychology. Johnjbarton (talk) 17:36, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds reasonable. (Personally, I have my problems with both, but getting into that would be OR...) XOR'easter (talk) 15:36, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]