Talk:Quantum-cascade laser

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Quantum-cascade laser article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

‹See TfM›

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Electronics

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Charge Carriers

The statement that electrons are the only charge carrier is ambiguous. Devices have been successfully demonstrated, which exploit intersubband transitions in the valence band. Of course, electron transport is taking place here, but one may refer to the process as hole transport when the majority of electron states in a band are occupied. I think the important point here is that intersubband transitions rather than interband transitions are taking place. - djsik 17:39, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reading over this, I should probably have said that electroluminescence has been observed for valence band transitions in SiGe. I'm not so sure about lasing. Anyway, the point stands that in principle, I'm not aware of a reason why hole transitions could not be exploited in a QCL. Anyone else more knowledgeable about this? Alex valavanis 00:04, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, they've definitely found electroluminesence in IV/IV semiconductors-- no lasing, though. The band jumps simply aren't big enough in SiGe. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.85.179.182 (talk) 09:22, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd argue that it's more to do with complexity of the valence bandstructure. At k=0, the heavy-hole band offset is quite large (~400meV I think) but as you move to non-zero in-plane wave-vectors, increasingly large contributions from the light-hole band are mixed in. This makes it very difficult to predict the scattering behaviour, reduces the effective band offset and increases the emission linewidth (which kills the gain!) There's still a chance though, that at very low temperatures it may be possible. There are also several groups looking at conduction subbands, but no decent experimental results yet. Papa November (talk) 09:42, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Device Fabrication

Although MBE is commonly used, I believe CVD is too. Does anyone know more about this? - djsik 17:39, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MBE was orginally used most often for the first decade because Alfred Cho, the inventor, was a member of the research group. MBE growth gives much cleaner layers. Interest in MO-CVD growth began relatively recently and has been growing due to the already-in-place industry growth facilities. This would make the industrial production of QCLs cheaper and more feasible.

Responding to this query: It has long been a goal to build QCLs by MOCVD because that makes production much cheaper. I believe a proof of principle has been achieved (I think by HP labs) but it was a very low quality device and it is not clear if this technology will really be made feasible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.173.26.151 (talk) 14:54, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Who is the inventor of QCL?

Orignal concept was published by Kazarinov and Suris in 1971 and then realized by the group at Bell Labs. I think the credit of invention should go to the original authors: "Possibility of amplification of electromagnetic waves in a semiconductor with a superlattice",Kazarinov, R.F.; Suris, R.A., Fizika i Tekhnika Poluprovodnikov April 1971, vol.5, no.4, pp. 797-800

Done Intro now contains the Kazarinov citation. Papa November (talk) 08:52, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Diagrams

There are some nice public domain images over on the Netherlands version of this page (nl:Kwantumcascadelaser); would anyone care to have a go at incorporating them here? — Catherine\^talk 08:06, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Major Typos

The equation starting dn1/dt in the section "Operating Principles" is all wrong. It should read dn1/dt = n2/tau21 + n3/tau31 - n1/tau13 - n1tau12 - Iout

Done Papa November (talk) 08:41, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Optical Waveguides

All QCLs ever published make use of a waveguide. What is this section supposed to mean? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.167.204.12 (talk) 13:35, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're quite right! I've tidied it up. We need to improve this section a lot - there's plenty that can be said about QCL waveguides. Papa November (talk) 14:25, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Daylight Solutions

I don't see any significant educational value for keeping this link in the article. Does anyone see any good reason to include it? It's important to avoid any advertising or promotion of commercial entities. Papa November (talk) 08:53, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Emission wavelengths

The statement about 2.75-250 micron "coverage" is misleading... a huge band is missing from the middle of this range (~1-20 THz frequency) owing to Reststrahlen absorption in III-V semiconductors. If anyone has any references handy, please add this. Otherwise, I will try to dig something out. Papa November (talk) 15:41, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Quantum cascade laser. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:42, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]