Talk:Quaker Council for European Affairs

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Religious Society of Friends (Quakers) (assessed as Low-importance).

European Union Low‑importance

	European Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Human rights Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability

If evidence of notability is not provided, then I am nominating this article for deletion. I am not saying that it isn't notable; just that this article doesn't give any proof as to that notability. J Milburn 20:58, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain what you mean by 'proof'? --Ahc 05:06, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have since become rather convinced that this group is notable, and this article is now better sourced. However, what I meant at the time was mention of two independent, reliable, verifiable, non-trivial references to this group, as is explained here. J Milburn 18:38, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see what happened, between when you posted and I asked, the verifiable references were provided, hence my confusion about your concern. It had already been fixed when I got here. --Ahc 05:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Quaker Council for European Affairs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]