Talk:Quaid-e-Azam Solar Park
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Quaid-e-Azam Solar Park article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in Pakistani English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Missleading sentence
[edit]I deleted a missleading sentence, bcause it was completely rubbish. Claiming, that a 100 MWp solar power plant doesn't produce 100 MW on average an that therefore the plant doesn't work as it should, because the average is only 18 MW, can only be explained by utter ignorance. No solar power plant does, not even close. And no other powerplant does either. In fact, the figures provided in the article are clear. The expected production was 153 GWh per 100 MW, which is about 17.4 MW on average. So the claim, ist should be 100 MW is clearly wrong. Andol (talk) 00:09, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
good Shoaibghafar (talk) 19:15, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Quaid-e-Azam Solar Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160311153117/http://en.tbeaenergy.com/ to http://en.tbeaenergy.com
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:16, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
true Shoaibghafar (talk) 19:15, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Known by another name
[edit]In researching Zonergy I found a contract to build 1000 MW solar facility in Bahawalpur Solar Power Park. Searching around it appears Zonergy refers to this location as Bahawalpur Solar Power Park, but Pakistan refers to the location as Quaid-e-Azam Solar Park. I am too new, can we include a search for "Bahawalpur Solar Power Park" to redirect here? I'm going to keep learning, but I didn't want to forget the original reason I dove into this rabbit hole. Dr Duvak (talk) 18:02, 11 October 2022 (UTC)