Talk:Quadratic unconstrained binary optimization

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

To do

Some things that come to mind that are missing in this article are

Approaches/Algorithms for solving QUBO (Branch&Bound, Heuristic Local Search, Adiabatic Quantum Computing, ...)
Complexity (NP hardness/completeness)
Some more application examples

--Smuecke1 (talk) 17:32, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[untitled]

The claim about quantum computing is problematic. The paper by McGeoch was a comparison between optimized hardware and unoptimized software, and further examination has demonstrated no advantage for existing quantum hardware (http://www.archduke.org/stuff/d-wave-comment-on-comparison-with-classical-computers/). If there is a theoretical reason why QUBO would be well-suited to quantum solving, then the article should reference that. 71.186.212.34 (talk) 16:31, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Leaving doubts aside, the page does not explain the problem being solved. The formula without annotations is useless. PetrGlad (talk) 09:16, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Domain

From what domain are $Q_{ij}$ and $X_{i}$ ? HenningThielemann (talk) 21:51, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I added that X are binary and Q real-valued and corrected the objective which missed the linear term $sum_{j=1}^{n}a_{i}x_{i}$ Alexander Mitsos (talk) 21:51, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Connection to Ising models - sign problem

In the first line of the derivation of the connection to Ising models, the sign in front of $\mu$ suddenly changes and no commented is made. Also, $x_i=x_i x_i$ is not in fact used on line two. Should be fixed. Maruti.punekar.patil (talk) 13:44, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]