Talk:Qingtan

NPOV

There are numerous sources which state that Qingtan had nothing to do with Taoism, except insofar as it referenced books which are currently thought of as "Taoist" (e.g. in The Sociology of Philosophies) - in fact it was quite antipathetic to contemporary Taoism. This article makes it sound like a branch of mysticism or Taoism which it was not. --131.111.184.8 (talk) 07:42, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As it stands, this article is trivial and wrong -- badly needs update. But the "dispute" here is off as well. Qingtan was an outcome or method of the xuanxue/neotaoism of Wangbi and Guoxiang. I would ask whether the anonymous poster above might cite the "numerous sources"? The SEP article on neotaoism clearky describes the practice, and as far as i reacall, the seven worthies of the bamboo grove practiced it. ShaziDaoren (talk) 19:24, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

the ip address of the NPOV comment is rrom a known vandal on internet content. clink on the talk link, above, ShaziDaoren (talk) 19:30, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Qingtan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:45, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]