Talk:Qalyoub train collision
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Questions
[edit]- Darth Vader? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.233.79.142 (talk) 21:51, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
- one driver or two?
- locomotive hauled trains often have two drivers (or driver and observer)
- multiple unit trains generally have one driver only.
- Track circuits or not? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tabletop (talk • contribs) 00:32, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
- type of signal? Semaphore or colour light?
- Any Outer Home signals?
- any ATC or AWS, etc?
- double or single line.
- junction?
- fog?
- are signals controlled by track circuits?
- diesel or electric traction.
- couplings - strong or weak?
- carriages - strong (steel) or weak (wooden)?
- signal failure?
- brake failure?
- Signal passed at danger?
- burst into flames?
Tabletop 01:00, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Answers
[edit]- aerial photo shows two tracks, which might not be two mainline tracks of a double track line.
- aerial photo shows no overhead wires, so train probably diesel powered, which is consistant with reported fire (from diesel fuel?)
- train reported to have concertinaed (aka telescoped). Telescoping less likely with strong couplings.
- reports of "light" signals would increase likelyhood of track circuits, a device particular good at reducing likely of collisions.
- burst into flames imples diesel trains with flammable diesel fuel.
Acccident Report
[edit]Observations
[edit]- ATC - mentioned in report
- "A console that identifies trains and their locations to control tower staff was also not functional."[1] seems to say that track circuits and/or a signal box indicator diagram weren't working.
References
[edit]External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Qalyoub train collision. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20071018212212/http://egypttoday.com:80/article.aspx?ArticleID=7037 to http://www.egypttoday.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=7037
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:38, 21 July 2016 (UTC)