Talk:QAC Quickie Q2

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the QAC Quickie Q2 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

documentation

this is an example of how far standards have fallen in wikipedia. Some pages are edited so strictly that sourced are demanded for every paragraph or few sentences and then there's this page that has practically no documentation and even involves misinformation and gobbledygook. "backside approach". There is no such thing unless you're a surfer. Tell me why I shouldn't delete entire unsouced sections. Jackhammer111 (talk) 20:11, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As per WP:V All material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, lists, and captions, must be verifiable. All quotations, and any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the material. Any material that needs an inline citation but does not have one may be removed. - Ahunt (talk) 23:22, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]