Talk:Python (Busch Gardens Tampa Bay)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk · contribs) 19:29, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:Pass
Pass/Fail:

The general manager of Busch Gardens Tampa, William Thurman, expected the approval for the expansion was anticipated due to the recent success seen at the park in October 1975 seems oddly worded. What is specifically tripping me up is expected the approval for the expansion was anticipated

Done Re-tweaked to: "In October 1975, the general manager of Busch Gardens Tampa, William Thurman, expected the expansion to be approved by the city of Tampa due to the recent success seen at the Busch Gardens parks." Adog (Talk・Cont) 20:37, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done Added the sub-titled header to the title as well found on page 1D of the St. Petersburg Times article. Adog (Talk・Cont) 20:37, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why is reference 23 used twice when it can just be used at the end of the sentence she expressed "feeling a little unsteady on [her] feet but exhilarated."?

Done Deleted. Adog (Talk・Cont) 20:37, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]