Talk:Pyrmont Bay ferry services

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pyrmont Bay ferry services article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Australia: Sydney / Maritime / Transport Low‑importance

	Australia portal Pyrmont Bay ferry services is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian maritime history (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Transport: Maritime Low‑importance

	Transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Maritime task force (assessed as Low-importance).

This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Darling Harbour ferry services. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.transportnsw.info/resources/documents/timetables/F4-darling-harbour.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:44, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Darling Harbour ferry services. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:43, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal October 2020

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was merge the existing Pyrmont Bay ferry services into this article and rename this article to Pyrmont Bay ferry services. Techie3 (talk) 15:22, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I propose to merge Pyrmont Bay ferry services (the "upcoming F4") into this article ("past F4" prior to 2017) and rename the article to Pyrmont Bay ferry services ("combined article"), for a number of reasons:

Both F4 routes are almost similar, if not identical
Both titles are confusing, you do not know which one is which unless you read the lead paragraph or infobox. I have already placed an "about" tag at the top of each article.
There is no table of wharves in the past F4 article. The table in the upcoming F4 article can be placed before the length prose-y "History" section in the combined article.
The "Service" section in the upcoming F4 article is empty anyway.
The "Service" section in the past F4 article is largely unreferenced (about the fleet used). These may be removed to cut down length.
The outcome of the combined article will be similar to Airport & South Line, which talks about pre-2013 Airport and East Hills Line and the current T8 line, both of which are identical in route.

Marcnut1996 (talk) 02:46, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have also pinged users who have contributed content to the upcoming F4 and F9 articles in the last week. @Fleet Lists and Techie3:

Support Fleet Lists (talk) 02:55, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Ridiculous and confusing to have two articles. 5910 C (talk) 04:36, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I am fine with a merge of the upcoming F4 into this article. BTW, pings do not work without a signature. Techie3 (talk) 15:26, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Update

I have already merged the content from Pyrmont Bay ferry services into this article. Now, we just need an administrator to perform a page swap. Marcnut1996 (talk) 02:46, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]