Talk:Pyogenic
Appearance
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from Pyogenic was copied or moved into Pus with [permanent diff this edit]. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Speedy Deletion Nomination
[edit]This article is more or less a shoddy dictionary definition, and since Wikipedia is clearly not a dictionary, I recomend we set a disambig or a link to the Wikitionary article by the same name.
- I think instead of deletion, it should be redirected to pus. Cmcnicoll (talk) 01:27, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
- Deletion is not a reasonable response to an article that requires improvement and expansion. (I don't object to a merge, however.) WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:22, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
Merge discussion
[edit]The short and poorly referenced Pyogenic infection should be merged into Pyogenic as they seem to cover the same topic. Gorrad (talk) 21:04, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
I agree AriaNo11 (talk) 19:36, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
- I went ahead and merged it Richard☺Decal (talk) 17:41, 27 October 2011 (UTC)