Talk:Pygmy three-toed sloth/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dunkleosteus77 (talk · contribs) 01:23, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Dunkleosteus77

change "...and Charles O. Handley Jr. of..." to "...and Charles O. Handley Jr., of..."; there is always a comma after "jr."
change "...the three other members of its genus" to "...the other three members of its genus" (optional)
wikilink "brown-throated sloth"
change "...the three-toed sloths endemic to..." to "...the three-toed sloth is endemic to..."

Please re-read the sentence, that is not what I meant.

change "..due to rise in sea levels" to "...due to a rise in sea levels" or "...due to rises in sea levels"
54-5, does this sloth have only six teeth?

Sloths lack incisors and canines, and according to the source the numbers in the formula are the sum of the number of premolars and molars.

wikilink "red mangrove" to Rhizophora mangle in the image caption
change "...population at 79 – 70 on mangroves..." to "...population at 70 – 79 on mangroves..." or "...population at 70 to 79 on mangroves..."

You appear to have misunderstood the endash, I have made it clearer anyway.

if this sloth lives on an island without predators, why would it need camouflage?

Interesting, but how do we know if the island has predators or not? Perhaps this was a trait it retained from the mainland brown-throated population. In any case, I have tried my best to add all information I could from such a limited number of sources.

change "...red mangrove leaves, that are..." to "...red mangrove leaves, which are..." or "...red mangrove leaves that are..."
for ref no. 17, use {{cite episode}}

Since this is a short article, that's all the comments I have. User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk 01:23, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your efficient review. I have either fixed all the above or responded. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 06:01, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It'll pass User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk 17:16, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.