Talk:Put Your Hands Up (If You Feel Love)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Put Your Hands Up (If You Feel Love) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Kylie Minogue Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kylie Minogue, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Kylie Minogue on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Kylie MinogueWikipedia:WikiProject Kylie MinogueTemplate:WikiProject Kylie MinogueKylie Minogue articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Music Low‑importance

	Australia portal Put Your Hands Up (If You Feel Love) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian music (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Electronic music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Why?

Why hasn't this article been put on wikipedia???Dollvalley (talk) 11:54, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An article was created, but it got deleted because the single hasn't charted yet. As soon as it charts somewhere in the world, the page will magically be allowed. Ridiculous I know, but this is Wikipedia after all! Paul237 (talk) 16:48, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It's really really stupid yes. Notability? How about being huge international singer Kylie Minogue's fourth official single released today officially? Charting should not be needed. What if it's a bomb? Tsk Dollvalley (talk) 23:13, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Read WP:GNG and WP:NSONGS and please don't make fun of others or mock them... Novice7 (talk) 06:52, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have read them and I don't see how this article doesn't meet that criteria. Please tell me what needs to be done to the article in the sandbox and how we can publish it. Dollvalley (talk) 11:50, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Charts

I have found a link for the charting of the song (http://www.music-chart.info/song/243218/Put-Your-Hands-Up-%28If-You-Feel-Love%29) and working on getting the release date and details for the Japanese market which seems to be the first market where the single bundle was released. Can we get the article ready for publication, with all this info I don't see why it fails to be notable. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Kylie_Minogue/Sandbox/2 Dollvalley (talk) 12:24, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but iTunes chart is a bad chart per our policies. As it has charted on iTunes, it should chart on the main chart next week or so. You can expand the sandbox article using the sources provided and the article will be published as soon as the song charts. Novice7 (talk) 13:27, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree that charts of one retailer only should be dismissed in the case of iTunes, seeing as iTunes is (sadly) still for many, the ONLY online retailer, and as such its chart should make exception.Dollvalley (talk) 19:17, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So, let me see, take a look at this new EP by Take That http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressed_%28EP%29 (to be released in a couple of days, no charts etc) why on earth would that be an acceptable article? It has less information than this article, and moreover, it could be merged with its parent album or lead single. Double standard????? Dollvalley (talk) 14:15, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The song charted on Belgian Ultratip http://www.ultratop.be/nl/showitem.asp?interpret=Kylie+Minogue&titel=Put+Your+Hands+Up+%28If+You+Feel+Love%29&cat=s Bloempje (talk) 18:14, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article should be published

I have edited the article and it is ready to be published. There is no reason to await charting, that is not the only requirement for a single. The content to the article itself is too big to incorporate into the album article. Also I fail to see why some articles get tangled up in these ridiculous discussions over publishing only after it charts and not, when I see so many articles being published before it is even released (see Take That example above). Article on here should be of use to people who want to know more about the subject and there is plenty of referenced information here, and charing is not an issue. If this single were to bomb it would be notable as being a rare failure of a single by the singer. And to who locked the page, you know what you can do with your coughs! Dollvalley (talk) 15:36, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Australian Chart Position

Put Your Hands Up (If You Feel Love) has entered the Australian ARIA singles chart at no.50 - http://www.ariacharts.com.au/pages/charts_display_singles.asp?chart=1U50 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.5.58.213 (talk) 11:56, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article versions

The last time I saw this article it was not just called "Put Your Hands Up (If You Feel Love)" and it was a better article with more references. What happened to that one? And why is there a deletion nomination box in the edit section? If it was deleted, and then brought back again, shouldn't that box be archived in some way? This way it looks like it's an outlaw article. UndDerMarlena (talk) 23:18, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Credits and personnel

Could someone double check that section and find the info I couldn't find (Recorded at ABC, Mixed by XYZ, etc.)? I Help, When I Can. ^[12] 09:13, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pro Motion as a source

Actually, the "blog" http://www.promotion-us.com is ran by Pro Motion, Minogue's US promotion company. Their base site is http://www.promotion-us.com. Found this out on the back of a promotional single. They get the charts early. This is good enough. This is especially valid when "Put Your Hands Up" keeps appearing and disappearing on Billboard.com. I don't know what the hell is going on with Billboard.com nowadays. It really trips up sometimes. P.S. I have spot checked the stories they do publish that I've sourced. They check out. I Help, When I Can. ^[12] 02:04, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Put Your Hands Up (If You Feel Love). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mixkylie.co.uk/images/covers/large/jpg/2078_b.jpg

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:31, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]