Jump to content

Talk:Purple Line (Namma Metro)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.railway-technology.com/projects/bangalore_metro/
    Triggered by \brailway-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 13:43, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 22:57, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit War

[edit]

@InfernalH:
@LeoFrank:
Please stop edit warring over that content, and having your "discussion" in edit summaries. It is obvious you two disagree on that content. The correct response is not to keep reverting each other, but to have that discussion here. So please do that. Note that even if you do not breach 3RR, you can still be blocked for edit warring, and the page can be locked down until you come to a consensus with everyone else who watches this page. I'm sure nobody wants to have to escalate to that level, so how about a discussion? CrowCaw 19:44, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Crow. I have asked the editor to engage in discussion, unfortunately they do not seem to be interested. In the 5 year history of this article, that editor's sole edits to this article are to undo my edits. Initially, it was claimed that content was removed due to WP:NOTNEWS. This is, frankly, a statement with no merit at all and I explained so in an edit summary. How can someone possibly claim that content sourced from a technical engineering report reads like a newspaper article? Even more baffling is the fact that my edits added the first non-newspaper source to this article. How is it possible that an article that was entirely sourced from newspapers doesnt fail WP:NOTNEWS, but the moment a project report is added, it apparently does? Perhaps, the editor realized that and then on their second revert, claimed the exact same content had to be removed because its an WP:ESSAY issue. As I said on the editor's talk page, he should first make up his own mind as to why exactly why he wants the content removed, and then we can discuss what needs to be done.
Also, and I genuinely dont want to say this, but I feel I have to. When most humans speak to me, the first thing they say is "hello", or "how do you do". That editor's first ever statement to me on wikipedia is to threaten a block, describe my edits as "crap", and inform me that "wikipedia is not the place for me". Apologies, but I do not wish to spend much time interacting with people like that. InfernalH (talk) 06:55, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Did not see the comments here earlier- the information given is copious long, un encyclopedic and not aligned in any ways to articles on all other metro's. For example - details of other alignments considered- not relevant to a metro that has been rolled out, and details of what one yard used for repair was used for before it became a metro yard- how is that relevant to the metro ? The article needs to be tighter, and LeoFrank and I have both tried to do that however InfernalH just reverts and does not agree. Engine Gone Loco (talk) 07:55, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:32, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Purple Line (Namma Metro). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:01, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:38, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Purple_Line_(Namma_Metro)&oldid=1257885522"