Jump to content

Talk:Purley on Thames

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did Nell Gwynne really live in a church

[edit]

The article says:

Purley's saxon church was demolished in the time of Stephen and Matilda, to be replaced by the current Norman church, St Mary the Virgin. It was once home to Nell Gwynne.

Seems a bit unlikely. I will request a source. -- Chris j wood (talk) 15:33, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect she lived in the village, rather than the church, and this is just sloppy wording. However, it has now been removed. Biscuittin (talk) 11:46, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence for the Removal of Hyphens in the Village Name

[edit]

Can the hyphens be removed from the name of the village in this article, please?

If one goes to the Royal Mail website, http://postcode.royalmail.com, and looks for the address of the parish office then one receives the following:

Purley On Thames Parish Council Goosecroft Lane Beech Road Purley On Thames READING RG8 8DR

By way of contrast if one uses the same site to seek the address of the Town Hall in Henley then this results in:

Town Hall Market Place HENLEY-ON-THAMES RG9 2AQ

Note the hyphens in the latter and not the former.

Further, using Google's Street View one can see the sign for the village when it is approached from the East. Use the following horrendous URL to view it: http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=Purley+On+Thames,+Reading&sll=51.537555,-0.904634&sspn=0.001021,0.002057&ie=UTF8&hq=&hnear=Purley+On+Thames,+Reading,+Berkshire,+United+Kingdom&t=h&layer=c&cbll=51.481483,-1.059603&panoid=GGO1zdkBxIzQUJd1lOfJ_w&cbp=12,49.08,,2,9.76&ll=51.489667,-1.059408&spn=0,0.032916&z=15

If anyone can provide evidence for the village name being spelled with hyphens I will back down.

Paulscoombes (talk) 11:25, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Social and Council Housing

[edit]

My addition to the page, where I tried to justify the statement that Purley contains affordable housing with reference to the social and council estate in Purley, was removed, supposedly for 'POV' contributions. How is this so? This is a fact, not an opinion, and it is evidence of the sentence which preceded it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ScienceLion (talk • contribs) 20:25, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Population of Purley on Thames

[edit]

Shouldn't the population count be updated to 4,394 since the new, 2011, census data is now available? See http://www.neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/dissemination/LeadTableView.do?a=7&b=11127746&c=RG8+8DQ&d=16&e=13&g=6397254&i=1001x1003x1004&m=0&r=0&s=1361011923378&enc=1&dsFamilyId=2545 Paulscoombes (talk) 11:07, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Purley on Thames. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:43, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Purley on Thames. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:02, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Purley_on_Thames&oldid=1209907911"