Talk:Pure Dope
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Notability
[edit]I am concerned that this article is being forced here by numerous single-purpose accounts as found in the article's history. This leads me to suspect there is backdoor promotional editing at work here for a subject that does not seem to meet WP notability guidelines due to a lack of coverage in reliable sources. Please do not remove the maintenance template until we sort out this issue and resolve what the sources say about Pure DOPE. -Delta13C (talk) 10:41, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
Not an acronym
[edit]It was Dope, does it still exist? In ictu oculi (talk) 16:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)