Talk:Pup-play

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Deletion discussions:
Nomination withdrawn, 29 May 2008, see discussion. Merge, 19 May 2008, see discussion.

Proposed Deletion

I removed the proposed deletion tag; I feel that it should be discussed and that said discussion might take more than five days. But I'd be interested in hearing others' feedback... Voyager640 (talk) 16:43, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To allow full discussion of whether this article satisfies the Wikipedia requirements for notability, I have nominated it for deletion via the AFD process. Interested persons are welcome to add their comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pup-play. Thank you. Edison (talk) 00:29, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

The first deletion discussion, which closed about three weeks ago, closed as a merge, but the merge has not yet been completed. Could I ask editors to point out the key issues that should be merged to Human animal roleplay as indicated by the discussion, in the next day or so, so I can then do the merge and redirect this? Tony Fox (arf!) 06:28, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I believe the consensus was to merge that which can be supported by reliable sources. Aleta ^Sing 06:35, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, the only refs are the books noted, and I don't see any indication of what sections are referenced from them.

Query: should this be redirected now? There's been a fair amount of addition to this since the AFD closed, most of it unreferenced; the merge might discourage that. Tony Fox (arf!) 15:58, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Moving on

As there hasn't been any movement here since my last query, I've merged a portion of the description from the lead of this article to Human animal roleplay and included a cite needed tag. This article had virtually nothing cited to reliable sources, so the merge/redirect was long overdue. Id' suggest that folks who want to work on this dig up strong reliable sources and work on some minimal expansion and sourcing of the section in the new article. Tony Fox (arf!) 02:49, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]