Talk:Punk literature

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Punk literature article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Punk music (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Punk music, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Punk musicWikipedia:WikiProject Punk musicTemplate:WikiProject Punk musicPunk music articles

Literature C‑class Mid‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Importance

This is a subject that merits an article, but it is not presented in the Wiki way. The problem is presentation, context and referencing.

Tyrenius 13:46, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge from List of literary punk genres?

I've proposed a merge of the material from List of literary punk genres into this article. This article is a bit newer than that one and has some information not in that, but the other one also has newer info that this page could use. As I see it, the two articles are essentially covering the same topic. Any thoughts? List them here or in Talk:List of literary punk genres. -- H·G (^words/_works) 18:19, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The literary genres are not tied to the punk subculture; if anything they share only names and an aesthetic. They should remain separate. WesleyDodds 05:15, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The concept of punk literature isn't inherently limited to literature produced by the punk subculture. That's just the way the article is now. I think punk literature could cover both literature produced by the punk subculture and literature inspired by the aesthetics of the punk subculture better than two seperate articles could. Both topics have equal claim to the term "punk literature" and they're related in a couple of ways. A single article by that title could cover both, and discuss the influence of the former on the latter, and vice versa. Ecto 21:06, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If article naming is your concern, then perhaps this article could be moved and the punk literature article could become a disambiguation page. The relationships between the two subjects are tenuous enough that they should not share an article. - EurekaLott 05:25, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:MedwayPoetsLP.jpg

The image Image:MedwayPoetsLP.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:30, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jillian Venters

Why is she in the article? To my knowledge she has written nothing on Punk Literature, indeed I am only aware of her writing one book at all. Sephiroth storm (talk) 20:17, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]