Talk:Punitive expedition

This article was nominated for deletion on 21 August 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force

Vote no deletion

This article have potential to grow and explain many details and cases of punitive expeditions, so thats why i'm against to remove this article. Dentren | ^Talk 10:11, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Afghanistan

It is too soon to add the War in Afghanistan to the list? As it fits Stowell's definition perfectly. - 58.106.46.227 (talk) 12:58, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reprisal vs Punitive, Actual vs Pretextual

The Reprisal Operation article should be merged into this as a primary type of punitive expedition. All reprisal expeditions are punitive but not all punitive expeditions are reprisals.

It's bizarre that reprisal article treats them as unique to Israel since reprisal attacks are as old as humankind. Should be merged as a type of punitive expedition not an Israeli military tactic. BTercero (talk) 02:42, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomenclature

Why is this called an "expedition"? Wouldn't something like "incursion" be more apt? A "punitive expedition" seems intentionally misleading. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:401:180:E1E0:20CE:C25E:6F76:972 (talk) 17:17, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]