Talk:Punishment Park

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.

Plot

More needs to be added - Spaceriqui 22:30, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. A more detailed summary of the plot developments, particularly detailing how Group 637 breaks apart into distinct factions, and detailing the backgrounds and arguements of the characters particularly of Group 638 and their tribunal members would really improve this article.

--DragonGuyver 16:26, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Responce

As a really big fan of this series, I'd like to see the topic of the responce to the film lengthened, including equal time for criticism. Citing sources may become problematic, the best source I know of is the retrospective included with the recent DVD release. But I haven't done the research for it yet, either.
--DragonGuyver 16:26, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, most of this seems to come unattributed from the Joseph A. Gomez essay reprinted in the DVD booklet of the 2007 New Yorker Video / Project X Video DVD release. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.19.193.199 (talk) 03:30, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Inconsistent budget data

The technical summary on the right says that the budget was $25000, but the Production section says it was $25000 + $66000 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.167.34.134 (talk) 20:41, 1 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

The 25.000 were due to a linked interview with cinematographer Joan Churchill which listed an incorrect amount. I've deleted the link and corrected the budget according to the film's original press kit. – --Robert Kerber (talk) 13:01, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Punishment park.jpg

Image:Punishment park.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:22, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Original Research and Unsupported Claims

Much of this article seems like original research and/or unsupported statements, such as the part about how viewers had strong reactions, debates, etc... This article is really in a very poor state at the moment. JettaMann (talk) 13:53, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Distributor

Project X is verified as distributor in North Amercia, see here. – Robert Kerber (talk) 13:01, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]