Talk:Puncheon Run Connector/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rschen7754 (talk · contribs) 04:25, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

What is a surface intersection?
- Reworded. Dough 48 72 19:01, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"development" - either be more specific, or remove it entirely.
- Clarified. Dough 48 72 19:01, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What does DelDOT stand for?
- Defined abbreviation. Dough 48 72 19:01, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What about the city of Dover not liking the proposal? That seems significant, doesn't it?
- Added. Dough 48 72 19:01, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not a requirement for GA, but the picture is a bit dark.

Thanks for the review, I have replied to the above comments. Dough 48 72 19:01, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]