Jump to content

Talk:Pui Tak Center

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articlePui Tak Center has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 13, 2009Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 21, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that after long-standing racketeering allegations, the FBI raided Chicago's Pui Tak Center, then known as the On Leong Merchants Association Building, in 1988?

Pui Tak Center GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Pui Tak Center/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gbern3 (talk) 18:37, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    I found two sentences where you need inline citations. In the lead: [1]The building was purchased by the Chinese Christian Union Church (CCUC) for $1.4 million and renamed the in 1993. Comment: You also need to specify what the building was renamed to. Also, this is not something that will hold up the article's promotion but do you really need to wikilink CCUC when the page doesn't exist? [2]In the History section: Starting this trend, the On Leong Chinese Merchants Association appealed to deed-holder and former Illinois State's Attorney Jacob J. Kern to hire architect H. J. Swanson to design a building large enough to house 15 stores, 30 apartments and office space on the 200 block of West Cermak Avenue.
    I don't normally put in-line citations in the lead. It is just a stylistic choice. But that specific sentence is used again in the body of the article, and it has a reference there! And wow, I don't know how I missed that error in the lead. I added what the building's name was changed to. As for the church link, I intended on maybe making the article one day, but it doesn't look like I'll get to it soon, so I just removed the red link for now. I also added the citation for your second sentence. --TorsodogTalk 21:48, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I didn't catch that sentence in the body, my mistake. Thank you for making the other changes. // Gbern3 (talk) 02:02, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Just cite those two facts (or remove the sentences altogether) and I'll be happy to promote the article. Leave a message for me on my talk page when completed.
    Fixes have been made. Changing status from "On Hold" to "Pass" and promoting the article. // Gbern3 (talk) 02:02, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Pui Tak Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:52, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pui Tak Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:53, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Pui_Tak_Center&oldid=1209901832"