Talk:Publius Lollius Maximus
Appearance
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
[Untitled]
[edit]The section 'Historian' is rubbish (deriving from the same two pages of Highet and a translation of Chaucer, cited eleven times), esp. the remarks about Chaucer. 'This claim can make available a major literary discovery of a lost work' is grotesquely unwarranted. 99.241.28.136 (talk) 13:56, 25 April 2016 (UTC)