Talk:Publius Cornelius Scipio Nasica Corculum
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a freely-licensed photograph of "Head of Ennius in the Vatican Museums" be included in this article to replace copyrighted images in order to better comply with our policy for non-free content. Many copyright-free image sources are listed at Wikimedia Commons, or you could create your own. Alternatively, you may request permission from the copyright holder of the original images to release them under a free license.
Wikipedians in Italy may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Untitled
[edit]I have a question about the reversion of the good-faith edit (as described by the editor who reverted)
This is what I added, after searching William Smith's Dictionary online
"However, the marriage apparently took place around 184-183 BC, in the lifetime of her father Scipio Africanus.[1]"
The reference was as follows: "William Smith (1870). Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology, says of Cornelia: "The elder daughter of P. Scipio Africanus the elder, was married in her father's life-time to P. Scipio Nasica. (Liv. xxxviii. 57 ; Polyb. xxxii. 13.)" [2]<"
This was not found acceptable, but my earlier unsourced assertations were. I am therefore quite puzzled. If Smith is unacceptable as a source for Roman history, please let me know.
wikibiohistory 18:49, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- I am equally puzzled. So much of early Roman history is "probable" that we have little choice other than to reflect that. You appear to have done your best to source things properly. Moreschi Talk 19:23, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
References
Misleading busts and statues associated with Scipio articles.
[edit]This is yet another Scipio article featuring a bust or statue which is unlikely to be them. There is no primary source for this identification and certainly no consensus among historians. One historian's conjecture (assuming they did actually state what is claimed) should not justify linking the image. See also the articles for Scipio Aemilianus and Lucius Aemilius Paullus Macedonicus. These misleading images, prominently positioned as they are, bring the credibility of the Scipio articles - if not Wikipedia in general - into question. Ljredux (talk) 10:43, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (military) articles
- Low-importance biography (military) articles
- Military biography work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Classical Greece and Rome articles
- Mid-importance Classical Greece and Rome articles
- All WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome pages
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class Roman and Byzantine military history articles
- Roman and Byzantine military history task force articles
- C-Class Classical warfare articles
- Classical warfare task force articles