Talk:Publius Cornelius Lentulus Sura

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mark Antony’s Stepfather

I think it's worth mentioning that he was Mark Antony's stepfather at the time of his execution. Sally quasa 19:28, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Was he praetor when he was killed in 63 BC?

The traditional story is based on the Third Catilinarian, where Cicero says that Lentulus' praetorship and citizenship were stripped (3.14 and 3.15). Berry Catilinarians (2020) pp 72–73, citing Barlow 1994, however contests this:

This cannot be correct, because, as Jonathan Barlow points out, in the senatorial debate of 5 December the conspirators' status as citizens was still an open question. Moreover, Cicero's claim that Lentulus was no longer a magistrate is contradicted by Cicero's own behaviour on the fifth [December]. Sallust relates that Cicero personally escorted Lentulus to his execution... this was a clear sign that he was still a praetor (as Sallust explains at 46.5) and that Cicero considered him to be one. As Barlow argues, what is likely to have happened is that Cicero was afterwards accused of sacrilege for executing a serving magistrates, and so added this passage in retrospective self-justification.

The open question of whether the Third Catilinarian can be wholly trusted should not be assumed away. Anyway, this is why I removed the (unsourced) portions of this article which asserted that he was stripped of his praetorship before execution. Ifly6 (talk) 05:53, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]